you know with the whole dawn yang vs xia xue thing going on
the whole blogosphere is like going nuts
i'm loving it!

lol yeah i do feel kinda evil after saying that..
but that's not the point of this entry.

i was reading on all the sites
because they are oh so interesting.
and for those of you who are so slow in catching up
(or maybe cos i'm free)
here are some links
xx vs dy
the lies of dawn
(again not the point of this entry)

FYI: with the whole plagiarism thing going on... i was suprised. i mean i always assume dawn had a brain (you know rj n everything), why can't she formulate her own opinions/whatever the stuff she copied? oh and i support xx. c'mon, she's like (i know not very uhm classy.... but the girls not afraid of being who she is!

OKAY SO THE POINT OF THIS ENTRY

so i was reading xx vs dy and it had this referrence bit
Non-Platonic Relationships
by David Policar

it truly entertained me.
he gave like this whole list of "non-platonic relationships"
along with explaination
here is why i found them interesting

A Cartesian relationship, characterized by doubts about whether there's really a relationship going on.
A more extreme version of this is the Berkeleyan relationship, characterized by an adamant insistence that there is no relationship going on at all.
Both of these can in time evolve into a Wittgensteinian relationship, in which the participants acknowledge that whether there's a "real relationship" is an ill-defined question that depends more on the structure of their language than on the reality of the relationship.
One of these is what mervyn and i have

An Aquinian relationship, that acknowledges that an exploration of the nature of the relationship is likely to strengthen rather than weaken it.
possibly what char and i have

A Nietzchian relationship, where both parties focus primarily on the will to power.
this is the type of relationship i want... world dominance

A Randian relationship, in which both parties act exclusively in their own self-interest.
this... i don't know whether i'm allowed to blog... but what i assume ken and kelda have (i assume it's no secret)

relationships by this dude called frank krausz

A Heraclitean relationship, which you may as well not categorize since it's not only different from all other relationships, it isn't the same from one moment to the next.
i assume only bipolar couples have that. i might am probably wrong

A Stoic relationship, which is also unique, but anyway it's no better nor worse than any other.
in another words... a boring relationship

An Epicurean relationship, which theoretically isn't very different from a Stoic one, but sounds like a lot more fun.
so this is just a dull one

A Humean relationship, in which what you see is what you get.
just like how you see i have no boobs... by getting into a relationship with me with not give me big boobies. like how mervyn will tell you

A Christian relationship, which soon degenerates into a platonic relationship because both parties are doing what they do want done back to themselves, instead of what the other party wants done to them.
if you're in this relationship zyun the love doctor will tell you to break up and hook up with someone just like you. but zyun the love doctor doesn't exist... so you'll just have to live knowing you'll never get what you want


lastly there's the zyun-shuaige relationship which always works the best because the shuai ge would have to do whatever zyun wants and it doesn't matter whether he actually considers himself part of the relationship because HE IS IN IT anyways. :D